[The efficiency and cost-utility ratio of interferon beta in the treatment of multiple sclerosis in Andalusia]. / Eficiencia y relación coste-utilidad del interferón beta en la esclerosis múltiple en Andalucía.

INTRODUCTION: The availability of the interferon beta in its three forms at the moment available in our country and of glatiramer acetate has marked a point of flexion in the natural history of multiple sclerosis (MS), but the high cost of these treatments cause that its use is questioned. In this work we have studied the effectiveness and efficiency of the processing with interferon beta, and the cost-utility of these treatments in MS in Spain has been also analyzed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: For this work we studied 102 patients affected of RR MS, treated with the three interferons beta which we have available in our country. We used as control 330 patients who had participated in the pivotal clinical interferon trials with both interferon beta 1a. In these patients in addition to effectiveness data, we have studied the disability measured as area below curve and the quality of life (AVACs). We also calculated the economical costs, considering the relation cost-utility in our country. RESULTS: Besides to confirm the data of effectiveness of three interferons, in this study a saving of 23 days/year is demonstrated what corresponds to 0.063 AVACs. The additional cost of interferons is greater than the avoided cost until the fifth year of treatment in which the tendency is reversed in favor of the group of treated patients, if we assume that the same effectiveness that we found in the first years is maintained in the long term. CONCLUSION: The use of the treatment with interferon beta is justified by its effectiveness, efficacy and efficiency. The additional cost of the treatment will be compensated in the long term if the effectiveness of the interferon beta is maintained.

[Cost-utility analisys of multiple sclerosis treatment with glatiramer acetate or interferon beta in Spain]. / Análisis coste utilidad del tratamiento de la esclerosis múltiple remitente-recidivante con acetato de glatiramero o interferón beta en España.

OBJECTIVE: To carry out a cost-utility analysis of the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) with glatiramer acetate (copaxone) or interferon beta (all, avonex, rebif and betaferon). METHODS: A pharmacoeconomic Markov model was used to compare treatment options by simulating the life of a hypothetical cohort of women aged 30, from the societal perspective. The transition probabilities, utilities, resource utilisation and costs (direct and indirect) were obtained from Spanish sources and from bibliography. Univariant sensitivity analyses of the base case were performed. RESULTS: In the base case analysis, the average cost per patient (euro in 2001) for a lifetime treatment, considering a life expectancy of 53 years, would be 1,243,906 euros (euro), 1,818,149 euros, 1,763,263 euros, 1,987,153 euros and 1,704,031 euros with copaxone, all interferons, avonex, rebif and betaferon, respectively. Therefore, the saving with copaxone would range between 460,000 and 737,000 euros approximately. The quality-adjusted life years (QALY) obtained with copaxone or interferons would be 10.977 and 6.917, respectively, with an average gain of 4.060 QALY patient with copaxone. The sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the base case. The interferons would only be superior to copaxone in the unlikely hypothetical case that they delay the progression of the illness by 20% more than that actually observed in clinical trials. CONCLUSIONS: For a typical patient with RRMS, treatment with copaxone would be more efficient than interferons and would dominate (would be more efficacious with lower costs) interferon beta.